![]() ![]() During the early fall of 1977, appellants were experiencing financial difficulties and were faced with the possible foreclosure of their home.The final judgment is, therefore, AFFIRMED. Accordingly, appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error. This is sufficient record evidence to affirm the trial court's finding that Weiss was prepared at all times to purchase the property. Although appellants assert Weiss refused to perform the terms of the contract, Weiss testified he attempted to close the sale on three occasions and that he was prepared to pay off the mortgage. This contract evinces mutual covenants sufficient to sustain this requirement. There must also be mutuality of obligation and remedy before specific performance is an appropriate form of relief. Therefore, we need not reach the issue of whether the note retained by Weiss constitutes sufficient consideration. In this case, the purchaser's promise to pay in exchange for the vendors' executory agreement was sufficient to form a binding contract. Appellants are correct in asserting a contract for the sale of realty, like other contracts, must be supported by consideration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |